<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>toxicsoftware.com - Latest Comments in Bash weirdness on Mac OS X Intel boxes</title><link>http://toxicsoftware.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://toxicsoftware.disqus.com/bash_weirdness_on_mac_os_x_intel_boxes/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 07:25:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Bash weirdness on Mac OS X Intel boxes</title><link>http://toxicsoftware.com/bash_weirdness_on_mac_os_x_intel_boxes1.html#comment-1655927</link><description>&lt;p&gt;On a Mac Pro:&lt;br&gt;uname -a&lt;br&gt;Darwin computer.local 8.9.2 Darwin Kernel Version 8.9.2: Thu Feb 22 18:08:23 PST 2007; root:xnu-792.19.2~1/RELEASE_I386 i386 i386&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;machine&lt;br&gt;i486&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;set | grep TYPE&lt;br&gt;HOSTTYPE=powerpc&lt;br&gt;MACHTYPE=powerpc-apple-darwin8.0&lt;br&gt;OSTYPE=darwin8.0&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So nowhere is there any mention of x86-64. that really throws a spanner in the works for porting 64b apps.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">robthebrew</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 07:25:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bash weirdness on Mac OS X Intel boxes</title><link>http://toxicsoftware.com/bash_weirdness_on_mac_os_x_intel_boxes1.html#comment-1655928</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I did, too. &lt;br&gt;$uname -a&lt;br&gt;Darwin Computer.local 8.9.1 Darwin Kernel Version 8.9.1: Thu Feb 22 20:55:00 PST 2007; root:xnu-792.18.15~1/RELEASE_I386 i386 i386&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;$set | grep -i type&lt;br&gt;HOSTTYPE=powerpc&lt;br&gt;MACHTYPE=powerpc-apple-darwin8.0&lt;br&gt;OSTYPE=darwin8.0&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Leo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 22:32:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bash weirdness on Mac OS X Intel boxes</title><link>http://toxicsoftware.com/bash_weirdness_on_mac_os_x_intel_boxes1.html#comment-1655926</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ha I just noticed this as well on my mac book pro.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stephen bigelis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:14:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bash weirdness on Mac OS X Intel boxes</title><link>http://toxicsoftware.com/bash_weirdness_on_mac_os_x_intel_boxes1.html#comment-1655925</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Still broken as of Oct. 20th, 2006.  This is a Mac Pro running 10.4.8.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;$ uname -a&lt;br&gt;Darwin delices 8.8.1 Darwin Kernel Version 8.8.1: Mon Sep 25 19:42:00 PDT 2006; root:xnu-792.13.8.obj~1/RELEASE_I386 i386 i386&lt;br&gt;$ set | grep -i type&lt;br&gt;HOSTTYPE=powerpc&lt;br&gt;MACHTYPE=powerpc-apple-darwin8.0&lt;br&gt;OSTYPE=darwin8.0&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm more annoyed by the i386 kernel, personally.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chris</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:16:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bash weirdness on Mac OS X Intel boxes</title><link>http://toxicsoftware.com/bash_weirdness_on_mac_os_x_intel_boxes1.html#comment-1655924</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just noticed that myself.  Very bizarre on Apple's part.  Hopefully they'll fix that one of these days.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">derek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 16:27:29 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>